Principals who have built successful companies often have large, well-resourced HR functions. Dedicated teams, executive search partners, internal talent pipelines, and sophisticated hiring processes. When the same principal needs to hire a Chief of Staff, a Senior EA, or a Head of Household for their private life, the instinct is to route the search through the company's HR team. Why not? The people are there, the budget is available, and the process is well-tested.
The instinct is wrong, and most principals who have tried it now route private hiring somewhere else. This article explains why. It is not a marketing argument for private recruitment firms. It is a structural observation about why corporate HR, however capable, cannot serve private hiring well.
For the way Oplu handles private and family office hiring, see our Family Office recruitment page and Private Households & Estates page.
Corporate HR operates within an organisation that has hundreds or thousands of employees, written policies, compliance officers, legal teams, and applicant tracking systems that log everything. None of this is private.
A search for a Chief of Staff to a principal is not a corporate search. The family's situation, the nature of the role, the household dynamics, and the principal's preferences are deeply personal and often commercially sensitive. Routing this search through a corporate HR function means the brief sits in a system accessed by dozens of people. Candidates may be interviewed by colleagues who talk casually about the process. The information leaks, not through malice but through the normal operation of a large organisation.
Most privacy failures are process failures. A corporate process is designed to protect a corporation. It is not designed to protect a principal's private life. The two requirements are not compatible, and the principal usually notices the difference only after something has leaked.
Corporate HR teams are excellent at what they do. They run structured interviews, apply equality and diversity frameworks, manage compensation benchmarking, and ensure legal compliance. These disciplines are critical in corporate settings.
Private hiring is a different discipline. It is not a subset of corporate hiring with additional discretion. The candidate pool is different. The assessment is different. The sourcing channels are different. The compensation structures are different. The reference process is different. The success metrics are different.
Asking a corporate HR team to run a senior family office search is like asking a good cardiologist to perform neurosurgery. The underlying medical training is there. The specific expertise is not. A few HR teams can develop private hiring capability over time. Most do not, because they have nothing to practise on. One senior private hire every two years is not enough experience to build fluency.
Corporate HR teams recruit from a pool of candidates who are actively looking, who respond to job boards, and who are open to corporate processes. This pool is large and well-served by existing infrastructure.
The best candidates for senior private roles are not in this pool. A senior EA at a UHNW principal's office is not on LinkedIn as "open to work." A Head of Household at a major estate is not responding to job ads. A Chief of Staff at a significant family office is not applying through application portals. These candidates are approached directly, through discreet networks, by recruiters they already know and trust.
A corporate HR function has no entry point into this market. They would have to build one, which takes years, or rely on external specialists. Most end up using external specialists while covering the administrative and compliance layer internally. That is often a workable compromise. It is not the same as running the search internally.
In corporate hiring, the hiring manager has a defined role within an organisation. Their preferences matter, but they are balanced against team fit, diversity requirements, and corporate standards. The hiring process builds in protections against personal bias.
In private hiring, the principal is the decision-maker and the role is personal. The successful candidate will have daily access to the principal's home, family, finances, and schedule. Personal chemistry is not a nice-to-have. It is the primary hiring criterion after competence. The process must accommodate this without pretending that corporate protocols apply.
Corporate HR teams find this uncomfortable. They are trained to eliminate personal preference. Private hiring depends on it. Asking HR to run a process where the principal's gut feel is the primary decision driver conflicts with their training and often produces candidates the principal ultimately does not want.
Accountability without authority creates churn. In corporate settings, this is usually a structural problem. In private hiring routed through corporate HR, it becomes a personal one.
Imagine the scenario. A Head of Private Office is hired through the company's HR function. The HR director is accountable for the hiring process but not for the placement's success. The principal is accountable for the placement's success but did not run the search. The new hire is managed by the principal but was hired by HR. When something goes wrong six months in, nobody owns the fix. The principal blames HR. HR blames the brief. The candidate leaves, and the cycle repeats.
A specialist private recruiter takes ownership of the full search, is accountable for the placement, and continues to support it post-hire. The accountability is clear. The authority is clear. The process works.
Corporate HR operates on documented salary bands, structured bonus schemes, and standardised benefits. These structures work because they apply consistently across the organisation.
Private compensation is not standardised. A Chief of Staff's package might include a base salary, a discretionary bonus, accommodation in the principal's property, private health insurance, school fees for children, co-investment rights in family vehicles, carried interest in private deals, relocation support, and an unstructured review rhythm. Each of these is negotiated individually. None of them fits a corporate salary band.
Trying to force private compensation into a corporate framework produces two bad outcomes. Either the package is under-structured and the candidate rejects the offer, or it is over-structured and creates internal tension when corporate employees learn that the principal's private hires are paid outside the corporate framework. Keeping the two worlds separate avoids both problems.
The practical approach is to separate private hiring from corporate hiring entirely.
Use a specialist private recruiter for senior private roles. Chief of Staff, Senior EA, Family Office Director, Head of Household, Estate Manager, CIO for a family office. These are specialist hires and warrant specialist representation.
Keep the company's HR function out of the private process. Briefs should not be shared internally. Candidates should not be interviewed by corporate colleagues unless there is a specific reason. Compensation should be structured separately.
Use an internal point of coordination, usually at the Chief of Staff or EA level, to manage the search from the principal's side. This protects the principal's time and provides a single point of contact for the recruiter.
Be explicit with both worlds about the separation. Corporate HR will often be relieved to have the private hiring taken off their plate. Private recruiters need to know that they are the sole channel.
There are specific moments when corporate HR capability is useful even in private hiring.
Onboarding administration. Contracts, right-to-work checks, payroll setup, pension or equivalent enrolment. HR teams handle these efficiently, and replicating them in a small family office is wasteful.
Legal and compliance review. Employment contracts, confidentiality provisions, and specific jurisdictional requirements are areas where corporate HR can advise or coordinate.
Scale moments. When a family office is hiring several roles at once (for example, building out a new operations team), HR can help coordinate timelines and paperwork.
In each of these cases, HR is supporting rather than leading. The search itself remains with the specialist recruiter.
Oplu runs the search end-to-end for our clients. We handle scoping, sourcing, interviewing, referencing, shortlisting, offer management, and post-placement support. Our work sits outside our clients' corporate HR functions by design. We interact with corporate teams only when specifically asked, and only for the administrative or compliance elements of onboarding.
Most of our clients came to us after trying other approaches. Some tried running searches through their company's HR. Some tried generalist agencies. Some tried to do it themselves. The common experience is that private hiring is genuinely different, and once they found a process that fits the world they actually operate in, they stopped experimenting.
For current opportunities, see our job board. To discuss a search, get in touch.
Because corporate HR is designed for corporate hiring. The candidate pool, assessment methods, compensation structures, and confidentiality requirements for senior private roles are different. Running a private search through a corporate HR function typically produces leaks, weaker shortlists, and tangled accountability.
8 min
8 min
9 min
