8 min
Most principals approach their first family office hire as if they were filling a job. They write a description, list the responsibilities, set a budget, and start interviewing. The first hire in a single family office is rarely a job. It is an architectural decision. Whoever you hire first will shape the culture, the processes, and the hiring pattern of the entire office for years.
The instinct is to hire an administrator and figure out the rest later. The instinct is usually wrong. The first hire needs to be senior enough to design the office, not just run it. Getting this wrong costs eighteen months and a full rebuild.
This guide explains how to think about the first hire, which role almost always comes first, how to scope it, and what it pays. For current opportunities and the way Oplu scopes founding hires with clients, see our Family Office recruitment page.
A single family office starts in one of two ways. Either the principal has accumulated enough wealth that informal management has become untenable and a structure is needed, or the principal has sold a business and needs somewhere for the capital, the team, and the family's administrative life to land. In both cases, the first hire inherits a vacuum.
That vacuum gets filled. The question is how and by whom. If the first hire is a senior generalist with the authority to design the office, they build something that can absorb the next ten years of growth. If the first hire is a junior administrator whose brief is to run errands, the office ends up shaped around their capacity, and the principal is back at square one within two years.
An office runs on habits. The first hire sets the habits. Good ones, or bad ones. There is no neutral.
The right framing is not "who do we need to hire first?" but "who is the first person we hire who can build the rest?" This shifts the brief from administration to architecture, and it changes the compensation profile, the candidate pool, and the process.
There are three viable options for the founding hire. The right choice depends on the principal's situation, but most single family offices start with one of these three.
Option one: a Family Office Director. Suitable for principals who want the office to be run as a business from day one. The Director designs the structure, hires the team, and manages the full operation. This is the most expensive option but also the most robust. It suits principals who have sold a business and want institutional-grade operations applied to their private capital.
Option two: a Chief of Staff. Suitable for principals who want a strategic partner before they want a structure. The CoS owns the principal's decisions, the adviser coordination, and the rhythm of the office. They often hire the administrator and the finance lead below them within the first twelve months. This suits founders and active investors who need someone to compress decisions before they need someone to run finance.
Option three: a Senior EA with operational scope. The leanest option. A Senior EA who can triage diary, travel, advisers, and administration effectively for twelve to twenty-four months while the principal decides what kind of office they want to build. This works if the principal is willing to do some of the architectural thinking themselves, and if the Senior EA is genuinely senior, capable of running a small office, and comfortable with the scope expanding later.
The wrong first hire is the classic trap. Many principals hire a Family Office Assistant or an Office Manager as their first person and end up doing the architectural thinking themselves. The office fills up with small decisions the principal has to make, and the point of having an office is lost.
The scoping conversation for a founding hire is different from the scoping for a replacement hire in an existing office. There is no existing structure to fit the person into. The person has to build the structure.
Start with the principal's intent. What does the principal want the office to do in five years? Investment management, philanthropy, family governance, property coordination, next-generation education? The list determines the eventual shape of the office and therefore the kind of person who should build it.
Define the first-year mandate. Within that five-year intent, what does the first twelve months look like? Usually it involves establishing governance, hiring the next two or three people, setting up reporting and compliance, and stabilising the principal's week. Write this down. The first hire is measured against it.
Agree decision authority. Can the first hire hire other staff? Can they sign supplier contracts up to a threshold? Can they engage external advisers? If not, they cannot build the office. These authorities need to be agreed before any candidate is approached.
Define the budget envelope. The first hire is expensive, and the hires that follow compound. A realistic first-year budget for a single family office with three to five staff sits at £1.5 to 3 million including salaries, premises, systems, and external advisers. Principals without a realistic budget end up either under-scoping the office or rebuilding it after eighteen months.
Agree how the principal will interact with the office. A weekly meeting? Daily contact? Open access? This is the single largest predictor of whether the first hire will survive the first year. Principals who expect open access from their first hire but hire an operator rather than a CoS typically burn out the operator and are back hiring within a year.
Three mistakes are responsible for most failed founding hires.
Hiring too junior. The instinct to start small is understandable but misplaced. Junior hires cannot design the office. They can only execute within a structure that does not yet exist. A junior founding hire usually gets promoted to a role they were not hired for or leaves within eighteen months.
Hiring a former colleague without assessing fit. Principals often hire someone who ran something for them in a previous life: a finance director from their old company, a chief of staff from their investment firm, a trusted adviser. Sometimes this works brilliantly. More often, the person is technically capable but does not understand private work, and the transition fails. Previous working relationships help, but they do not guarantee fit with a family office environment.
Skipping the scoping work. Principals who are impatient to start can skip the scoping and regret it. The first hire is the most important hire, and it is worth two or three months of scoping to get right.
A family office can tolerate imperfect systems. It cannot tolerate unreliable ones. The first hire is judged on reliability before anything else. A founding hire who delivers the easy things consistently wins the trust needed to deliver the hard things later. A founding hire who is brilliant but inconsistent never gets to the hard things.
Founding hires are premium roles. They combine seniority, broad scope, and the pressure of being first.
Family Office Director as first hire:
UK: £200,000-£350,000 base plus bonus, often with equity or carry participation
US: $400,000-$700,000 base plus bonus
Chief of Staff as first hire:
UK: £120,000-£200,000 base plus bonus
US: $250,000-$450,000 base plus bonus
Senior EA with operational scope as first hire:
UK: £75,000-£130,000 plus bonus
US: $130,000-$220,000 plus bonus
On top of base, founding hires often receive a sign-on bonus, enhanced pension or 401(k) contributions, co-investment rights in family-sponsored vehicles, private health insurance, and relocation support if they are moving jurisdictions.
The cost of the first hire feels high in isolation. Relative to the cost of a bad founding hire and a full rebuild eighteen months later, it is cheap. Relative to the value the office creates when it is structured well, it is negligible.
A good operator reduces noise first, then builds systems that hold under pressure. The first hire should spend their first ninety days stabilising what exists, not rebuilding it. Stabilisation usually looks like: mapping the principal's current adviser web, understanding the existing bank accounts and entities, taking over scheduling and travel, triaging open admin, and establishing a weekly cadence with the principal.
Principals who hire aggressive institutional operators and unleash them on a personal office in week one often regret it. The first hire needs to read the environment before they reshape it. Candidates who understand this instinctively succeed. Candidates who treat the office as a greenfield start-up often trigger a family conflict within a quarter.
Oplu has placed founding hires into single family offices across the UK, US, and Switzerland. Founding searches are always retained because the brief is bespoke, the scoping is substantial, and the pool of candidates who have successfully founded or shaped a family office is narrow.
Our process begins with a long-form scoping conversation with the principal, often supported by their lead external adviser. We agree the architecture, the authority, the budget, and the cultural tone before we approach anyone. We then present a shortlist of candidates who have demonstrably built or shaped an office of comparable scope, not candidates who have worked in one. The distinction matters.
Founding hires take time. A typical founding search from engagement to offer runs twelve to sixteen weeks. Rushing the process is the fastest way to make the wrong hire.
For current opportunities, see our job board. To discuss a founding family office search, get in touch.
Usually a Family Office Director, a Chief of Staff, or a Senior EA with operational scope. The right choice depends on the principal's intent, how active they want to be, and the complexity of the initial mandate. Hiring too junior first is the most common mistake.
8 min
7 min
8 min
8 min